![]() |
This process results in a number of by-products including ethane, propane, various types of butanes and pentanes, hydrocarbons, sulfur, carbon dioxide, and water vapor. In some cases, helium and nitrogen are also produced. To produce hydrogen fuel from fossil fuel, a process called reforming is typically used. The primary device used in this process is called a reformer, interestingly enough, and this causes the steam to react with the fossil fuel given sufficiently high temperatures. The most commonly used reformer in hydrogen fuel production is called a steam methane reformer. During the fossil fuel-to-hydrogen fuel production process, a considerable amount of carbon in the form of carbon dioxide is released into the atmosphere. Because of this, fuel cells that utilize fossil fuels are not as environmentally friendly as they would seem, and they therefore do not contribute significantly to the global emission-reducing campaign. One of the most common-and least expensive-methods of producing hydrogen is a process called steam methane reforming, which uses natural gas or syngas as a raw material. In addition to producing hydrogen, this process is also commonly used in the industrial production of ammonia. With sufficiently high temperatures in the 700ºC to 1100°C range and the use of a metal catalyst such as nickel, the steam causes a reaction with the methane in order to produce carbon monoxide and hydrogen. At lower temperatures, even more hydrogen can be produced via a gas-shift reaction with carbon monoxide. One of the most significant uses of hydrogen is as an energy source for fuel cells. In vehicles with an on-board reforming hydrogen engine, a methanol tank is commonly used in conjunction with a steam-reforming unit, and both of these devices take the place of bulky hydrogen tanks. Nevertheless, the bulkiness of such a system has made many manufacturers discard the use of an on-board reforming system as being too unpractical for regular use. This system also has further disadvantages, the most notable of which is the production of carbon dioxide emissions into the atmosphere, making such systems largely irrelevant for emission reduction usage, as explained previously. A further drawback to this system is that the cost of producing
hydrogen by this process is still largely dependent on the scale
of the application. While larger systems may be able to produce
sufficient hydrogen to offset the costs, smaller system do not
present a significant cost advantage over traditional energy production
systems. |
|
|
© 2010 Hydrogefuelnow.com. All
Rights Reserved.
|